Showing posts with label in which I am outspoken as usual. Show all posts
Showing posts with label in which I am outspoken as usual. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 1, 2014

Queer Romance Month

Queer Romance Month is exactly what it sounds like, a month long celebration of all types of queer romance. In a perfect world any time romance as a genre was celebrated or talked about queer romance would be included in there. However we do not live in a perfect world and queer romance is often thought of as its own distinctive genre, separate from "mainstream" aka heterosexual romance.

Which means that when romance is highlighted or celebrated queer romance gets mentioned maybe once in passing if that.

Queer Romance Month comes out of this. It is an entire month just to talk about and celebrate queer romance of all sorts, note a token post, not a single blog hop, but an entire month long event.

This year Queer Romance Month is October and it starts today.

All sorts of authors and romance genre people are participating in this years event. The organizers of the event have encouraged all of us writing posts to be thoughtful, to think outside the box and not just write the same old posts about why we write/read m/m romance. Instead I suspect there will be a wide range of topics covers from the ultra serious to more fun and light hearted. The topics I've heard murmurs of people writing about on Twitter have sounded amazing and I am looking forward to reading articles that touch on things that are often not talked about during genre events.

The months looks to be packed, there are 3 plus articles going up on the Queer Romance Month website daily.

We've already kicked things off with KJ Charles' super insightful article on the problems with thinking of queer romance as its own genre. 

Tracy Timmons-Gray's very practical and helpful article on how to raise community awareness about queer romance. Seriously after reading this article I looked at my local library system and discovered that although they owned almost a thousand romance titles none of them were queer romance. I am going to be looking into changing that soon.

And a very cute and funny audio from some of the people involved behind the scenes talking about Queer Romance Month, queer romance recommendations and other queer romance stuff. 

There is also a Queer Romance Month launch party over at Joyfully Jay's blog going on today (October 1st) that includes massive give-aways, check it out!

My own post is tentatively scheduled to go up on Halloween. So if that doesn't change I will be chatting with folks and replying to comments while sitting on the couch eating candy and watching haunted house movies.

For Queer Romance Month I chose to write about the personal reasons I write trans romance and why I believe trans romance and the inclusion of trans characters into all branches of romance is important.

It is going to be a lot of more of me talking about my experiences and feelings than I usually do. So that's both terrifying but also I think necessary.

So check out Queer Romance Month, and keep checking out out all the way through October. It is going to be a good time. 


Thursday, September 11, 2014

Gay Romance Northwest Meet-Up 2014 and Other Events

In in a little over a week I will be flying to Seattle WA to take part in Gay Romance Northwest Meet-Up 2014 and several other romance writing events.

This is every exciting for me since it will be the first writing con I've attended as a professional author, and boy I am starting out with a bang.

I chose to attend GRNW even though I am an East Coast author because I had heard amazing things about the con from people who attended in 2013. Also because I was/am impressed by how proactive the organizers of the con were in seeking out authors who wrote a wide spectrum of queer romance. Unsurprisingly romance novels about white, cis, gay men and the authors who specialize in them tend to dominate these kinds of events. GRNW though has worked very hard, and I hope been very successful, making sure their events including a wider range of GLBT romance.

So the events themselves, where will I be?:

On September 19th I will be taking part in Queerly Yours: A Celebration of LGBTQ Fiction

7:00pm – University Book Store (University District Location)
Sept_19_2014_Authors_Image
Gearing up for the Sept. 20 conference “2014 Gay Romance Northwest Meet-Up” at the Seattle Central Library, GRNW presents a special reading event at the University Book Store with five authors attending the Meet-Up—Rose Christo, E.E. Ottoman, Jordan Castillo Price, Radclyffe, and Rick R. Reed. From coming-of-age stories to paranormal mysteries to contemporary romances, each writer shines a spotlight on LGBTQ lives, loves and relationships, and promotes the theme that there’s Happily Ever After for everyone.

RSVP on Facebook.

I will be reading from my lesbian, trans, paranormal romance novel Selume Proferre. I will also be mingling and chatting with folks after the reading. Selume Proferre will be available for purchase as a gorgeous paperback through the University Book Store.

 On Saturday September 20th the Gay Romance Northwest Meet-Up itself will be held.

1:00pm I will be giving part of the Keynote Address: Write with Pride.

Coming off of the successful June 2014 event “Write with Pride” at Gay City, we’ll be doing a similar format for this year’s keynote where five writers will be sharing letters to their past and future selves. and celebrating looking back and looking forward with love, respect, hope, strength, and pride.

The participating writers are Rose Christo, E.E. Ottoman, Jordan Castillo Price, Radclyffe, and Rick R. Reed.

I will be reading an open letter to my future self about my hopes for my future as an author but also for the future of the genres I write in.

4:00pm I will be on The Evolving LGBTQ Romance Genre Penal. 

Otherwise known as the return of the popular Diversity Panel! This panel explores special topics such as diversity (or lack thereof) in LGBTQ romance, and how the genre is evolving.

Moderator

Nicole Kimberling (Author, Turnskin, Primal Red)

Panelists
  • David-Matthew Barnes (Author, The Jetsetters, Swimming to Chicago)
  • Rose Christo (Author, Gives Light, The Place Where They Cried)
  • Lori L. Lake (Author, Gun Shy, Under the Gun)
  • Pearl Love (Author, The Uncertain Customer, ‘Til Darkness Falls)
  • E.E. Ottoman (Author, Selume Proferre, The Memory of Blood and Lotuses)
I think this will be a great panel with lots of interesting things to say. The topics we've kicked around so far focus on where the romance industry will be going over the next couple of years with regards to diversity and I think this is a great group ot talk about that.

5:00pm-ish the Gay Romance Northwest Meet-Up Book Festival will start. 

I will have an author's table at the book festival where you can come talk to me, buy a book or pick up some cool free swag. I'm super excited about the swag I ordered and I'll have plenty to give away. I will also be signing books during this time if you are interested.

My books that will be avaliable in paperback form are:
Selume Proferre
Like Fire Through Bone
The Memory of Blood and Lotuses
Private Dicks: Undercover anthology

Other than these specific events I will be wandering around, attending panels and workshops. Come track me down and say hi. All of the crazy things I talk about online I am more than happy to also talk about in person.

Particularly if you are a author/reader/editor/publisher with an interest in non-binary/trans romance I would love to talk to you. What would you like to see in the future? What are you hopes/fears concerning this tiny subgenre? I am especially interested in talk to you if you are an author/publisher with no prior experience with nonbinary/trans romance but is looking to branch out.

All in all I am definitely looking forward to this trip.

 

Sunday, August 17, 2014

On the Presumed Heterosexual Cisgender Audience and Writing LGBT Romance

This whole argument that only straight cisgender women write and read LGBT romance needs to stop.

First of all there is no evidence that this is true, there has never been any widespread surveys done on either the readership or writers of LGBT romance. The largest statistical survey of romance readers was done by Romance Writers of America, and did not include data on sexual orientation or gender identity. Small survey attempts have been limited and inconclusive. While anecdotal evidence would call a cishet majority into question.

Therefore the assumption that any branch of LGBT romance is prominently written/read by straight cisgender women is questionable at best.

And here is the thing, the vast majority of the time when this assumption is brought up it is in the context of shutting down conversations about diversity, GLBT politics, representation, fetishization, sexism and racism within romance.

Usually this argument goes "well this is what sells because this is what these cisgender heterosexual women want to read. I wish it were different but if you want to sell books you just have to put your ideals aside and get back to writing bare-chested firefighters."  This is a problem because it supports the status quo and shuts down important conversations that need to happen. It also paints cisgender, heterosexual writers and readers in the worst possible light, as more interested in getting off than being allies.

Over the last three years that I have been actively writing in the romance genre I've come to the conclusion that this argument and assumption just needs to end. Whether or not it is based in any kind of statistical reality, we need to stop relying on it.

Not only does it shut down important conversations that need to happen but it also automatically assumes LGBT people are outsiders in a genre that deals primarily with representing them. It also assumes that the most important voices in the LGBT romance community are cisgender heterosexual ones.

For instance a lot of m/m romance publishers assume their readers and authors will mostly be cisgender heterosexual women with some gay cisgender men thrown in and the language they use reflects this. A lot of presses that started out as het romance publisher and have since branched into GLBT romance also use language that presumes cisgender heterosexuality. As does some presses that started out as m/m romance presses and became GLBT romance presses. Review blogs that started out or focus on m/m romance also often uses language rooted in this assumption. As does a lot of general romance, m/m romance or LGBT romance blogs.

Language is important. Inclusive language is something I look for when trying to tell if a publisher, blog or community will be welcoming and safe for me as a queer author and queer person. It doesn't really matter how many rainbows you plaster onto your website, if you participate in homophobia awareness events, or post lots of pictures of gay men kissing. If the language used is homophobic, transphobic or reads like this is a cishet only clubhouse it's going to give me pause. Or it may make me back off and not want to be part of that space all together.  

For instance when I first came into the m/m romance community the phrase "chicks with dicks" was used a lot. Publishers used it, reviewers used it, authors used it. Now I've been in fandom, I've written fanfiction, I know that's where it comes from. On the other hand the phrase itself is incredibly sexist, marginalizes both cis and trans effeminate men and vilifies trans women.

Right from the beginning it's common use make me, as a effeminate trans dude, extremely uncomfortable, and made the space of m/m romance seem unwelcoming and unsafe for someone like me. Luckily people began to voice concerns with it's use, as did I once I was no longer a newbie, and it has since widely stopped being used. But these kinds of language choices that actively marginalize LGBT authors and readers should not be a part of the LGBT romance community at all.

What would cut down on these kinds of language issues I think is if publishers, reviewers, bloggers and authors would stop assuming a cisgender heterosexual majority.
I truly don't think right now the majority of publishers expect all or even the bulk of their authors to be GLBT identified. I think their language reflects this and because for most LGBT people being cautious is a matter of safety, it becomes self-fulfilling. On the other hand I've watched publishers who changed their language to become more inclusive and emphasized a full spectrum of LGBT romance gain dozens of GLBT identified authors.

This doesn't just go for publishers but for writers too. Take that whole narrative of straight cis women liking sexy men and two sexy men being better than one, put it in a box and bury it in the backyard. Because when we write romance novels about queer people assuming our audience is completely or mostly cisgender heterosexual we run the risk of doing several things that are kind of a problem.

First Othering and alienating actual queer people and queer experiences. By assume your readership is straight than you can more easily end up having a large part of your romance being about explaining what it's like to be queer to people who have never had that experience. Which says to those of us who live with those experiences everyday 'this book isn't meant for you.'

In fact there is an unfortunate tendency within contemporary gay romance to 'explain' to the readers that not all gay men are music theater loving hairdressers. It is not something any queer person needs to be told and quite frankly shouldn't be something straight people need to hear either.  Yet it is so common multiple queer romance authors, completely independent of each other, have come up with special terms to refer to it. Laylah Hunter calls it the "Broadway musical moment."

Reading something like this pulls me out of the story and tells me I am reading something that isn't for me despite the fact that it is supposed to be about me. It feels like I've just walked into some straight fantasy of what my life should be like instead of representing any kind of reality I inhabit.

Which brings me to the second risk of writing LGBT romance for a presumed straight heterosexual audience, you become much more likely to fetishize queer people. Because queer people in stories aimed at cishet people are often not reflective of queer experiences or exploring queerness, they become much more of an exotic subject for people to live out their fantasies through. They become objects usually only defined by their sexuality and physical attractiveness.

Consider these very common statements:
The only thing better than one hot men is two hot men having sex with each other.
Why would I want to read a gay romance about men who aren't hot?
Why would I want to read a sex scene if there's no dick?
The reason straight women like gay romance is because straight women like dick.

The accusation of fetishization gets thrown around the m/m romance community a lot, and often in pretty sexist, and even transphobic/homophobic ways. BUT it is important I think for straight cisgender readers and writers to think very critically about the way they talk about queer bodies and queer sexualities within this community.

I am not saying this always happens when gay romance or any other kind of LGBT romance is written for a cisgender heterosexual audience. But it is a lot easier to reduce a gay couple down to the fantasy of two hots guys, a lesbian couple to two hot chicks, and trans people into sexual fetishes when you assume the actual people represented will not be the primary audience for these books.  

Speaking directly to a queer audience will limit the amount of time a writer will spend describing queer identity and queer bodies as strange, exotic or Other. It also becomes a lot harder to fall into the trap of dehumanizing a gay, lesbian or otherwise queer couple, if you write with the intention that the majority of readers will be themselves queer.

I also think speaking directly to a presumed queer audience will encourage cisgender, heterosexual authors to police themselves, and think critically about their internalizing homophobia, transphobia and their privilege. 

Another issue with a presumed heterosexual cisgender audience is that it puts pressure on out queer authors to write about queerness in certain ways that might not feel authentic or only write about say, gay men, rather than queer women or nonbinary people. It also teaches a heterosexual readership that they can demand certain things from queer authors and are entitled to get them. That if there is queer romance authors writing LBGT romance our experiences and our voices must always come second to heterosexual cisgender voices and experiences.  

I can't count how many times I've been told or watched queer author friends be told "all gay romance is written by straight cisgender women for straight cisgender women." Thus denying the identities and very existence of all queer authors, privileging straight authors over queer ones, books written for straight readers or queer ones, and stopping conversations about queer voices within LGBT romance from even happening.

I don't know how many times I've voiced my opinion as a queer trans person only to be told "Yes, but most readers are ..." the heterosexual cisgender majority myth again. The assumption is this is the voice with the buying power, thus this is the voice we should be listening to. The reality being cishet comfort or personal taste is privileged over queer experiences and opinions.

This is how I ended up being lectured by a cishet man who was mad that I chose to write lesbian sex in a way different from what he found most appealing. Or how I get told that because cishet women don't like vagina I can't write about trans men and call it m/m romance. This is how the queer identities of a huge number of authors get erased every time the whole 'women can't write gay men' argument gets brought up.This is how we end up with situations where trans authors are forced to 'prove' they are not really 'women pretending to be men.'

In fact the whole controversy around trans men as characters gay romance does not stem from all straight cisgender women (or cisgender gay men) being against trans inclusion. But because the ones that are know that their voices will be privileged because they are automatically assumed to speak for the majority.
read from the bottom up
Because this is the thing, queer people are actively oppressed by cisgender heterosexual society. Trans women are murdered, queer kids are forced to live on the streets, queer women are raped, people loose their jobs, their homes and their families because of homophobia and transphobia. That is the reality of the world we live in.

LGBT people don't have adequate representation, they don't get to see themselves heroes, don't get to see themselves has being deserving of happy healthy relationships, or non-judgmental partners, they don't get happy endings.

That's what romance brings, a chance for LGBT people to see themselves reflected in narratives that aren't solely tragic.

What kind of an industry are we to turn around and cynically say "but you don't matter. It isn't about you, or your happiness, or your pleasure." Because that what is really being said when someone says  "our readership is cisgender heterosexual so this is the way things need to be" instead of talking about issues of diversity, fetishization, and language. 

It says, we know these books are supposed to be about your but your not as important as the presumed cishet readership.
 LGBT romance needs to first and foremost be about LGBT people. Even if we were to one day do a wide spread comprehensive survey and find that the majority of LGBT romance readers are indeed cisgender heterosexual people that shouldn't matter.

We cannot continue to write, publish, market and form communities under the assumption of a heterosexual cisgender majority. Because when we do we assume heterosexual cisgender needs and opinions come first, they carry the most power, they count for more. We should never ask or expect queer authors to cater their narratives to a cishet audience.

We can no longer continue this behavior where we hold the specter of a heterosexual cisgender readership over the heads of authors who want to write alternative kinds of queer bodies, transgender characters, non-penetrative sex or even female characters.

We can not privilege cisgender heterosexual voices, desires and tastes over queer authors, readers and politics.

We cannot say "all LGBT romance authors and readers are straight cisgender" and erase the queer identities of the authors (especially female authors) already working in these communities, the readers already buying our books. 

Thursday, February 20, 2014

Why Is Lesbian Romance So Unpopular When Compared to Gay or Straight Romance?

I've thought about this a lot. I've written both gay and lesbian romance and although my lesbian romance gets far better reviews and nominated for far more awards I don't sell as many copies. Period. People aren't as interested in reading it. Even when I do give-always people are far more likely to want a copy of my gay romance novella than my lesbian romance novella.

A lot of people say romance readers are straight women so of course they are naturally going to be more interested in books with hot men. I think that is the easiest, least complicated, least threatening way of looking at the issue though.

I also don't really buy it, never have. 

What i really think is that women have a hard time thinking about women; about female bodies, female sexuality and female characters in general.   

Our society tells us female sexuality is dirty, wrong and shameful. Always. It tells us the female body is only ever not shameful or acceptably sexual when a man is looking at it. When a woman looks at herself, she is conditioned to only see the flaws, only see the ways she isn't attractive, only feel ashamed. 

In her article about why female fans hate female characters more than male characters "For All the Women I Have Loved Who Were Dragged Through the Mud"  Aiffe writes:

"Women project the standards society has put on them. If they’re told they’re annoying for talking about their feelings, they’ll think other women are annoying when they talk about their feelings. It’s a continuous cycle of policing. I think there is a certain degree of truth to this. Women absorb the social rules of what women are and aren’t allowed to be (spoiler: it’s all contradictory and we’re not allowed to anything) and judge other women by those rules. She’s annoying when she speaks, her voice is too shrill, she’s too meek and quiet and passive, she’s too rude and direct."

I think for a lot of women reading lesbian romance makes them have to confront their own anxieties and insecurities about their bodies and their sexualities as well as other women's bodies and sexualities. 

If both of the main characters are women and you find yourself having a negative reaction to them or to their gender and sexuality, you might find yourself questioning why? Is it something about you? Something about them? Something about women in general? It might make you stumble upon a whole new level of internalized misogyny you didn't realize you had.

That can be deeply frightening and off-putting. Not something a lot of people want when reading a romance novel.

It is so much easier to think about male bodies and male sexualities which are constructed as natural, normal and overwhelmingly positive. Sexualized cisgender male bodies are not associated with the same kind of body policing or shaming (this isn't actually completely true for all men but generally the kinds of men who are policed and shamed don't get romance novels written about them even in m/m romance) that sexualized female bodies are.

I think this is also where some of the backlash against 'strong female characters' comes from. Anytime this subject get's brought up in the writing community someone always pops up (almost always a woman) to tell me "not all women are strong" and "we need to write stories about non-strong women too." It has happened so frequently at this point that I think it's moved past the point of critiquing the way Hollywood has constructed "the strong female character" (which I think genuinely does need to be critiqued). The conversation is hardly ever framed as "the way the Strong Female Character is constructed in say Hollywood  action films or the fantasy genre is problemtic" instead it it almost always portrayed as "strong women as characters are problemtic." This distinction has caused me to wonder if a lot of women get triggered by any kind of talk of strong female characters because they themselves don't feel strong or don't consider themselves strong and its anxiety inducing for them to have what makes a woman 'strong' talked about at all. 

In the same way I think for a lot of women it's triggering to see women portrayed as confident and sexual without having men involved. It brings up, all of their own insecurities about their bodies and their sexualities. It highlights all of the ways they've been told that they are bodies aren't good enough and their sexual desires are wrong without the 'safe space' of a male body or male sexuality to retreat to. 

But there is also I think another layer to the question of lesbian romance vs. gay romance and why one is so much more popular than the other.

I also think it also has to do with the way (white, cisgender, able bodied, middle class) gay male identity is portrayed in the media and in Western society. 

Because m/m romance does better than lesbian romance, and bisexual romance, and trans* romance. It just does better period. Also in the m/m romance community the men being represented are almost always in white, able bodied, middle class men who conform to a normative standard of physical male beauty. There aren't a whole lot of chubby guys in m/m romance, disabled guys, working class guys (unless he is falling for a millionaire in which case the class problem will be 'fixed' by the end of the book when he marries into privilege.) Gay guys of color are often not represented and forget about trans guys. That can't be a coincidence.


"Popular culture was teaching newly-out gay men that they could be welcomed into the heteronormative fold so long as they shoehorned themselves into these pre-approved [media constructed] molds of gay male identity. " 

Basically he argued that the media and society has created a gay identity that is acceptable and non-threatening to heteronormative culture. These are the kinds of gay characters even otherwise homophobic Americans enjoy seeing as bit roles in tv shows like Will & Grace.  

Lisa Duggan has pioneered the concept of homonormativity which is:

"a politics that does not contest dominant heteronormative assumptions and institutions, but upholds and sustains them, while promising the possibility of a demobilized gay constituency and a privatized, depoliticized gay culture anchored in domesticity and consumption"  [1] (emphasis mine) 

Of course this heteronormatively acceptable homosexuality or homonormativity is really only available to white, cisgender gay men who conform to the acceptable stereotypes of a gay man. But these 'acceptable types of gay masculinity' are exactly what the overwhelming majority of m/m romance novels promote. They are comfortable and non-threatening images of gayness easily consumed by an audience that might even be, in many ways, homophobic. People can feel good about being "supportive allies" to the GLBTQ community through consuming these images of very normative white, able bodied young men. Whiles these images also mean that they never have to question any of the deeper homophobic, biphobic or transphobic views they might still hold.[2]
                                                               
Lesbian or other queer women on the other hand, along with any and all trans* people and QPOC, are still threatening to heteronormativity. These unacceptable forms of queerness are just not as easy or comfortable for a large part of a wider Western audience to consume.

I think that, coupled with a lot of the internalized anxiety and shame women feel about female bodies and female desires, makes lesbian romance or romances that depict queer women significantly less popular.     

----
Thank you to everyone who read over this first and encouraged me to post it. 

1. Luibhéid, Eithne.  "Queer/Migration: An Unruly Body of Scholarship."  GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, Volume 14, Number 2-3, 2008, pp. 169-190 (Article) Published by Duke University Press

2. this needs to be an article in and of itself but I haven't written it yet, because it would involve a long discussion of the hierarchy within gay politics, assimilation, and representation.  

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Queer Romance Blog Hop


Welcome to the Queer Romance Blog Hop, where queer writers and readers of queer romance share their thoughts on the genre, as well as a few recommendations for books to read! Everyone participating in this blog hop identifies as queer and also reads and/or writes (or edits, or reviews!) queer romance. For our purposes, queer romance refers to books with:

1. LGBTQ+ main characters
2. In romantic relationships
3. That have a happy ending. (No Brokeback Mountain here, folks!)

Hey all!

On twitter Heidi Belleau asked writers of queer romance who are also queer if they wanted to participate in this blog hop. Since I write queer romance and self identify as queer I thought it could be a fun thing to do.

For those of you who don't know me, I write under the name E.E. Ottoman. I started out writing in the m/m romance genre but have since branched out to write f/f romance, and trans* romance. I have predominantly published with Less Than Three Press, and Dreamspinner Press.

So here are my answers to some questions about my experiences/thoughts/and feels as a queer identified person working in these subgenres.

1. Let’s start off with the getting-to-know-you stuff: How do you identify, and what does that mean to you? Whatever level of detail you’re comfortable with, of course!

I identify as queer and trans*  

When it comes to sexual preference I am an androphile in that I am attracted to masculine identifying and presenting people. The way this has played out in my own life is that I've been attracted to either butch/ masculine of center people or trans* men. I've never been in a relationship with a queer or gay cisgender man but I'm not excluding the idea that it could happen in the future. 

As far as gender identity goes I identify as masculine, under the trans* umbrella. My gender is, and for the last few years has been, very much in the process of transitioning so I find I have a hard time identifying myself any further than that. I present in a masculine way, and think of my body in a very masculine way. My masculinity tends to be more effeminate though but I'm comfortable with that.

2. What’s your preferred “flavour” of queer romance (e.g. trans*, f/f, m/m, menage with queer characters, etc.) Why?

I have written m/m, f/f, and trans* romance. Right now I am write a ménage story with queer characters (cisgender man/trans* man/ third gendered, androgynous person) ::laughs:: so all of the above?

As a reader I enjoy mostly fantasy romance and science fiction romance. Because the fantasy and science fiction romance out there is predominantly M/M I end up reading predominantly M/M romance books. Which are great stuff but I would love to see more really amazing fantasy romance with trans* main characters or some lesbian knights.

3. Do you write/read/review? Do you think being queer affects your participation or platform in romancelandia?

Being a queer writer of romance who entered the genre through m/m romance has been tough, I'm not going to lie. There are a lot of great people in the genre, a lot of great readers, writers and reviewers, but there can be some prejudice too. The m/m genre is very white cisgender male oriented, it's pretty much everywhere from pictures on review sites, graphics, the covers of novels, people's tumblrs, author's inspirational photographs. The young, able, heavy muscular, white, cisgender body is held up as the perfect male body and the supreme form of male beauty and masculinity. Also the genre tends to idolize traditional jock, and alpha male masculinities. It can really marginalize those of us who don't have that kind of male body or who aren't attracted to those kinds of body and masculinities.

Also I've found a disturbing amount of trans*phobia in the genre as well. Some readers don't seem to know how to deal with books about people who aren't cisgender. I had one reader accuse me of making up genderqueerness as some kind of plot device. Readers have told me that it's a matter of taste and not everyone is into reading "that kind of stuff" when it comes to m/m romance where one or more of the men are gay or bi trans* men.

As someone who is queer I've been compelled to take a stand for more inclusion of trans* characters, for more education among writers and readers about issues which face the LGBTQ community. There's a lot of big talk within the m/m genre but not a lot of work being done around other queer people asides from gay men. Even when we fundraise for LGBTQ causes gay men are the only ones ever talked about. There also seems to be limited awareness about gender identities and gender variance, miro-agression, heteronormativity and all the larger systemic ways LGBTQ people are marginalized. Drawing attention to this lack of awareness and educating people about them is something I feel is really necessary to do in order to make this community more accepting of people like me.

4. What drew you to queer romance?

My body is such a big deal in the real world: who gets to regulate it, how I identify, how I present, who I have sex with, what right I have to make any of these decisions for myself etc.  Yet sex, gender, and sexuality is so marginalized in most literary genres. It seems to be the less sexually appealing a sex scene is the more like "art" it is, if it turns people on than it's porn and automatically worthless.

Since sexualized queer bodies are double stigmatized for being sexual and being queer I think it  makes taking sex, romance, sexuality and gender seriously when it comes to the art and craft of writing even more important.

Romance is the one genre were I feel like I can explore gender and sexuality fully without marginalizing it and that is not only accepted but celebrated.

5. What do you love about queer romance in general, and/or your specific subgenre?

I love that ability to create great fantasy science fiction and other kinds of speculative fiction that doesn't marginalized the romance and the sex but embraces it and celebrates it. 

6. What’s your pet peeve?

I get kind of annoyed with f/f and lesbian romance about the emphasis on femme/femme and femme/butch pairings. Very rarely do you ever see butch/butch or butch/masculine of center couples. I know the concept of butch/butch coupling is rather loaded in the lesbian community. They do exist though and I do happen to find them sexy so there pretty much nonexistence in the genre makes me sad.

In m/m romance I hate the over-emphasis put these athletic, able, white, young cisgender male bodies and the jock/alpha male masculinities. It wouldn't bother me so much I think if they weren't so overwhelmingly prevalent and if they weren't often held up as the best most attractive way to be male.

I also hate insta-love ::laughs:: in pretty much any genre. I'm okay with insta-lust though as long as the author calls it like it is.

7. What growth would you like to see in the genre, going forward? Any ideas on how to accomplish that?

I would love to see more inclusion and acceptance. Right now I feel like f/f and m/m writers/readers don't do anything with each other and the communities are pretty separate. I would like to see more cross-over between the two communities, more conferences were both groups of writers interacted, more reviewers taking on both, more publishers publishing both, just more community over all.

I would also like to see more acceptance for trans* characters and non-binary characters across the board. I know that there are some writers who are all about writing trans* characters and some publishers who are actively looking for stories with trans* and non-binary characters but I still encounter a lot of readers (mostly of m/m romance) who don't want to read books with trans* or non-binary characters and get very defensive about it. There's a lot of love for the cisgender cock in m/m romance.  

We need to encourage education around inclusiveness and LGBTQ awareness among both writers and readers. Writers need to write more trans* characters, or at least question if all their characters need to be cisgender. I think most writers just default to cisgender characters and if they do think of writing trans* characters they feel too afraid especially if they themselves are cis. I think though if authors can write characters who are gay, even though they themselves are straight or bi (as most writers I've encountered are) then they can write trans* characters even though they themselves are cisgender. They just have to take that step and try.

I think readers also need to trust that it won't ruin their story if the characters aren't all cisgender. If they want stories about hot guys together they can still have that and not all the characters need to be cisgender. If one or more of the characters are transgender men that doesn't magically make it not gay or not about guys. Just like having trans* women in a story doesn't automatically make it not a lesbian romance. 

I think we need more representation of people who write all sorts of characters at conferences and conventions. I do think writing LBGTQ characters and writing about sex and gender takes a lot of research and a lot of work. I would love to authors supporting each other in that research and work. I talk with writers every day but for the most part I don't know what most of them do for research when it comes to sex and gender or writing LBGTQ characters. I'm sure a lot of them have resources I would love to know about and I have some pretty cool resources too (especially about sex ;) ) that I wouldn't mind sharing. I think networking and building healthy communities is so important.

The support needs to come from outside of just writers too. Whenever a writer publishes something that portrays LGBTQ characters in empowering, positives ways reviewers need to be all over that. Readers need to spread the word, blog about it, tumblr, tweet. Again I think networking and community is everything.

8. Do you seek out other queer authors when you read?

As a reader though I don't feel the need to search out books specifically by queer authors, I think anyone queer or straight can write kick-ass queer characters. That being said if I know an author is queer I am more likely to buy their books to support them and show solidarity.

9. How do you feel, in general, about straight peoples’ participation in reading, writing, and reviewing queer romance?

I don't think queer people should be the only ones responsible for writing about queer people. I think that straight people need to write about queer people too, even if it means challenging themselves. I think straight people who write queer characters need to really question the role of heteronormativity in their lives though, just as male authors who write books about female characters need to constantly be making sure they are checking their male privilege. I think straight writers need to be particularly careful not to fetishize queer people especially gay men. They also need to be careful not to represent all LGBTQ issues through the lens of attractive white cisgender gay men only.

Also it is straight alleys' responsibility to be quiet and listen when queer people have a critique or comment about the genre and representation of queer people. Then to take that critique or comment seriously, not get defensive or brush it off.

At the end of the day I write my stories for a queer audience. If straight readers read and like my stories that's great but in general my stuff is not aimed at them and I don't go out of my way to write queerness to make straight readers feel comfortable. I love my straight readers but it isn't about them.


10. Rec us 3 titles in your chosen subgenre and tell us why you love them.

Picking just three is tough. Since I mostly write fantasy romance I've pick three that I think best illustrate the richness of LGBTQ fantasy romance (also note: I was kind of taken aback by the fact that all the books that turned up on this list are m/m. So more lesbian and trans* fantasy romance is definitely needed) However these book are totally awesomesauce

This is a great fantasy novel with lots of political intrigue and really indepth world building. The different characters and cultures are well fleshed out and well articulated. It's also a great romance with some really hot sexual tension between the two main characters. I love that their romance seems to happen slowly and naturally. Also has a side note I love how arrange marriage isn't portrayed as this life-destroying thing by any of the characters and being married to someone you are friends with but not in love with isn't seen as a loss necessarily. 

Read any of Sasha Miller's books and you will finds some of the most meticulously well thought out magic systems in the fantasy genre in general. This book is a great example of that, and of her ability to create unique and intriguing fantasy world. The two main characters in this one are also great examples of alternative masculine body types and masculinities that are still portrayed as attractive and worth while. Also one of the characters is differently abled through being the victim of a crime later in life and I found the way Miller handled his reaction to his differently abled-ness as well as how it was perceived by the other characters to be both realistic and sensitive. There were so many moments were a less skilled author could have turned it into a really negative portrayal of what it means to be a differently abled person but Miller handled it beautifully all the way through. Also this is NOT a hurt/comfort story as much as it is a great fantasy story in which one of the characters comes to terms with their differently abled-ness. I highly recommend it.

This is a great fantasy novel with not one but two atypical romance heroes! Many reviews of this books said it read like a fairytale and I found it less fairytale like and more like really good historical fiction for a world that never existed. The world Fielding creates is rich and multi-layered with it's own history, mythology and religion, magic is real in this world but rare. The story of a man born over seven feet tall, poor and orphaned young, who saves a prince and ends up working guarding another man who's magical abilities are more curse than gift makes this story a great fantasy novel. It's also an amazing romance too however and the Fielding manages to balance both well.


So that's it for me! I feel really long winded now. Thanks for reading and for following the tour! Be sure to use the links below to check out more great posts from our participants!

Tuesday, October 8, 2013

"making the whole world LGBTQA is unrealistic" or why I find this common writing wisdom to be false

A rule of thumb for writing LGBTQA characters or fiction whether you write romance, literary fiction or fan fiction seems to be you can't make the whole world queer.

One or two queer people is great. That's why we are here after all. The main couple will be queer, maybe some close friends but more than that and it becomes unrealistic. The whole world after all isn't LGBTQA.

I've seen making an entire cast of characters, or the majority of characters queer described as utopian, unrealistic, annoying, bad writing, and eye-roll worthy.  In one recent, and memorably extreme, example a person described an author's choice to make an unacceptably large number of people in her work queer as proof that queer culture wants to destroy heteronormative culture.

Which is ... fair actually, but I digress.

The thing about it is I've seen this pearl of wisdom (can't make the whole world queer or your a bad writer) passed down everywhere from the comments on YouTube to professional writers' boards. Everyone from fan fiction writers to m/m romance writers have talked about this, cautioned each other not to make this writerly faux pas

Whenever I see this conversation come up it really, really bothers me.

This is why:

Being cisgender and heterosexual is one way of expression gender/sexuality out of hundreds.  Even if we are just going to go by letters of the acronym H for heterosexual is one letter out of six if you are going with LGBTQA and eight if you are going with QUILTBAG.

We are raised in our society to think there is only one right way of being and that is straight. On top of that we are also taught that almost everyone is straight except for a small pool of people who happen to be genetically abnormal. In reality expressions of gender and sexuality are much more complex and multifaceted. I can't imagine how it would be unrealistic, or bad writing to show that complexity.

Anyone who has ever written a LGBTQA character knows that one of the ways heterosexuality is portrayed as dominant is by the complete erasure of all non-heterosexual people from media images. This is why LGBTQA characters in general are so few and far between.

Another way that heterosexuality is portrayed, and enforced as dominant is by teaching us all to think of it as the default position. People are always straight until proven otherwise thus majority of people in any given situation (unless it's a queer orgy) must be straight. This is less based on peoples' actual sexual identities or practices and more based on heteronormativity and power.

The majority of people you know are not straight cisgender. You might think they are because we are taught to default to these two identities and because being out as anything else in our society is still difficult and danger.

The reality of the situation though is queer people do have siblings who are also queer. Gay people have siblings who are also gay, or parents who are gay or neighbors or coworkers. There are such things as LGBTQA dominated neighborhoods, work spaces, and social spaces. Portraying these relationships and these spaces are not unrealistic.

To take a page out of my own life right now both of my bosses are gay. Not to mention the fact that my brother is gay and my sister is bisexual, and I myself am queer. It happens, it is real. One of the unintentional side-affects, I've notice, of this shying away from making too many characters queer is queer community is often erased. As is connections between queer family members such as siblings. 

The people who populate the worlds we write about should have sexual and gender identities that fall all over the place and include all sorts of things, one of which should be heterosexuality, but only one.

I think that there is something problematic with only representing one sexuality or gender identity. Portraying a world in which everyone is white, cisgender gay men is also problematic. The issues of racism, ableism, sexism and cisgender privilege innate in creating such a world does need to be addressed.

Let me be clear though, it does not carry the same kinds unhealthy power dynamics as the presumption that there is something wrong with a world that is not dominated by straight/cisgender people. Or quite frankly the policing that takes place when you tell someone that they are bad at what they do for writing such a world.

If seeing a fictional world dominated by gender and sexual identities that are not cisgender and heterosexuality bothers you ask yourself why? Does your anger or discomfort really have to do with bad writing or a lack of realism?


Monday, August 26, 2013

16 Questions I Ask Myself While Writing Sex Scenes

So unlike a lot of romance author's I've spoken with I really love writing sex scenes. Not only that I also really love reading a well crafted sex scene.

However in my personal opinion nothing kills a story faster than a bad or boring sex scene. It turns out that sex is actually rather hard to write.

So I've come up with a series of questions I ask myself and some tips I keep in mind, which I hope helps to keep things interesting and fresh.

Does this story need a sex scene? 

Sex scenes are great. They are fun to read and can tell us a lot about a character's pass experiences, their relationship with their body, their sexuality, and themselves in general. A good sex scene can make it feel like the relationship between the main characters has really deepened and/or it can help drive the plot forward.

However to write a good romance sometimes you don't need a sex scene. No one should ever write a sex scene as filler or because they feel obligated to do so just because they are writing romance. If the story doesn't need it and you are not into it, or are not sure what you're doing, don't write it.

Before I start I always ask myself does this story need a sex scene? What work does this sex scene do for the over all characterization and plot?

What is my character's relationship with sex? 

People have all different relationships with sex and different sexual acts and their bodies. Knowing how my characters feel about sex, what they consider to be sex, what they like, what they don't like, and how they think of themselves as sexual beings or don't is important. I need to have a good handle on all of this before writing a sex scene. 

I try not to be afraid to make my characters have some sexual hang ups or unusual desires. It's okay to have a character who is body conscious and doesn't feel comfortable taking their shirt off during sex or gets triggered by fingering. It's okay to have a character who gets off on fantasizing about licking sweat out of his partners arm pits, or has a Daddy kink or who isn't interested in sex at all but just really wants to kiss and cuddle. I just try to rock it all.

Have my characters talked about this? 

Talking and negotiating a huge part of healthy and consensual sex. Nothing makes me, as a writer and a human being, feel better than knowing I've done my best to make healthy and consensual sex sexy. It can be easy to just cut the talking and get to the fucking but I try and remember not to be afraid to have my characters talk about the sex they are going to have or talk about the sex they want to have. I try to remember whenever possible to have my characters talk about what they like sexually and what they are afraid of.

As writers we know showing is always better than telling. So I try hard not to just tell my readers that my characters are in a healthy, loving sexual relationship but actually show them that they are, and communication is a vital part of that.

What about protection and consent? 

Consensual sex should always be the goal when writing sex scenes between two people who care about each other. No always means no both in fiction and real life unless safe words are being used and saying no without stopping is an agreed upon part of the scene. There is nothing sexy about a character saying stop and meaning stop and being forced to have sex anyway, no matter how "turned on" their body might be. I always try to be aware of consent. How do my characters know the other is consenting? Also related to this yes also means yes. My characters need to trust each other. When one says "I want this" after they've talked and negotiated the other character needs to trust that they do want it or will be able to say stop if they stop wanting it. Taking a "I know what is best for you" attitude when your partner has clearly stated their limits and desires is not healthy. If I am portraying a healthy relationship I need to show and not tell and these little details matter.

Safe sex is incredibly important especially if you are working with a contemporary setting. As a sex geek I am constantly educating myself about different sexual practices and how to do them in safe sane and healthy ways. This means communication, but also taking precautions against disease and injury. As far as I'm concerned you can never over use safe sex supplies in a sex scene, condoms, dental dams, and latex gloves should all be a part of a scene especially if your characters are not fluid bonded. Once again I say, research, research, research I always try to know what is out there, how to use it and what to use it for as far as safer sex supplies go.

Lube is also incredibly important to help keep the sex free of injury and unwanted pain. I try to research different lubes what they are used for how common they are or easy to get. When I write non-contemporary settings I research what the best lube alternatives are for my given setting. Usually there are lots of options to choose from because let's face it, people have been fucking for a long time. 

Does it make sense for both parties to be on board with that? 

Not everyone likes the same things sexually and that is okay. Something that might feel fantastic for one person feels uncomfortable or painful for another and that is okay. One person's ultimate favorite kink might be another person's trigger, and both of these people have the right to feel the way they do about it.

Both of my characters do not need to be on the same page about every sexual act. It is completely fine if one character is totally turned on by something that the another character is either unsure of or down right squicked by. In fact this can add real texture and depth to a story. I know as a reader I always sit up and take notice of authors who actually go there and add these kinds of details to their sex scenes.

When these situations arise the characters should talk about it and either negotiate a way where they both can enjoy the act, or figure out a slightly different act that they both can enjoy and will be comfortable with or discuss the act but realize it is not going to work for them and set it aside completely.

Have I done my research? 

I am a sexually active adult but there are hundreds and thousands of sexual acts, kinks and experiences I haven't had. On top of that my body and my physical needs are often not like those of my characters. Therefore research is vital, I need to know the nitty gritty of how to do an act, I need to read accounts from people who have done it about what does and doesn't work and how it feels. I need to know how to do it safely, what supplies are involved, and also if there is prep and what kind.

If my character has certain physical need, I research it. If my character's body is different from my own I research what sex is life for someone with that body type (an especially good idea if you are writing trans* characters or characters with a disability) If my character has a kink or fetish I research that, if I am writing about a toy I've never used I research it, a positions I've never tried? I slap some research on that too.

You can never be too informed about something I say.  

How old are my characters, do either of them have any physical limitations or differences I need to be aware of? 

Kane (who I have mentioned before) is partly paralyzed which means that certain sexual positions need to be modified but also that he can not get erect without being touched and that keeping an erection while penetrating his partner is difficult.  He is also in his fifties which means that muscles and joints can get stiff faster than when he was younger and he will probably won't be up for seconds (if that involves erection and ejaculation) any time soon.

These are all things I need to be aware of while writing sex scenes involving this character. Also I need to do my research about what is and is not possible for Kane due to his disability and what, if any technology or toys exist to help him out. For instance some people with mobility based disabilities like using sex swings to help hold themselves up during sex. Since Kane is a gay man it is also important to find information which does not general but addresses the needs of gay men with his disability.

Likewise Vasilios and Lui Yi are both fully castrated eunuchs so what they can and can not do sexually and how they do or do not experience pleasure need to be taken into account when writing sex scenes with them in it. They can both feel pleasure for instance but not nessisarily in the same way a non-castrated man would and they also won't peak or orgasm in the same way either, if at all. Again for me doing the research was key.

Does this scene/story really need penetration? 

I love anal penetration. I like reading about it and watching it in porn, writing it and taking part in it. Penetration though as a sexual act is over represented in our culture and in gay and straight romance and erotica. The fact of the matter is even for me it gets boring and their are thousands and thousands of other sexual acts these characters could be taking part in.

Some people don't like penetration, some people aren't physically or psychologically capable of it.

So I try and really think about first what my characters relationship to penetration is? Do they like it? Do they hate it? Does it bring up baggage?

In Like Fire Through Bone Markos dislikes penetration as a sexual act and Vasilios has serious issues with it due to the abuse he's suffered. So when I sat down to write the sex scenes with them in it penetration wasn't even an option, although they do talk about it several times.

Finally I ask myself does the story need it? would it be just as hot if I used some other kind of sexual act?

Sometimes nothing but penetration feels right for those characters at that moment but of I don't need it, than I don't put it in.

There is no such thing as one right or true way to have sex. 

This is not a question but it is something that I try to keep in mind. Anything can be sex, anything. If the people involved feel like they are having sex than they are having sex. End of story.

Penetration is not any more "real sex" than anything else. A character who does not like or participate in penetration is not missing out on "real sex" and may not need to be 'cured' of their aversion to the 'best' kind of sex.

Fingering can be real sex
Frottage can be real sex
jerking someone off with your hands or feet can be real sex
masterbating for show can be real sex
being caned can be real sex
kissing can be real sex

The idea that there is one true way of having sex and everything else is foreplay or not "real" or that penetration = sex and nothing else does are truly damaging stereotypes floating around our society. Thus I am ever weary that I don't reenforce them when I write about sex.

 I am I afraid of imperfection and awkwardness in this sex scene? 

Usually the point of writing a sex scene in romance and erotica is to have it be hot and fun to read. That being said sex is sometimes imperfect and awkward. Sex is like everything else it take practice, it takes messing up and lots of time and research to get right. Even amazing sexy sex has it's awkward moments where people fumble, get into weird, uncomfortable positions or try something that doesn't quite work out.

I try and ask myself, I am afraid of showing those moments and embracing them? Can I let my characters have an awkward moment or two without ruining my readers enjoyment of the scene? It is a hard line to walk, to be sure, but it is something I strive for because it add that little bit of flavor and realness to a scene and sets it aside from the thousands of other sex scenes out there. 

What are my options as far as toys and other equipment?

The sex toy industry is huge these days and statistics show that in the United States a large portion of the population, both male and female, use sex toys. Also although they tend to be associated with masturbation the vast majority of reviews I've seen for everything from vibrators, to wedges, to butt plugs, to penis cages have been written by people who use these toys with a partner.

Yet the use of toys during sex scenes in romance is something I don't come across often and that's a shame. Usually when I sit down to write a sex scene I think about the character's relationship to sex, their sexual preferences, kinks, dislikes and then I come up with a list of toys they would likely enjoy. If they seem like the kind of people to whip out a toy during the heat of it, I write it into the scene. If it's a toy I've never used before usually I do quite a bit of research reading reviews and testimonial from people who have so I can describe it correctly.

Now a fair amount of what I write is fantasy with historically inspired settings but really that shouldn't stop you. Dildos have been found in many ancient civilizations, as have butt plugs, ben wa balls and cock rings. In the modern area butt plugs came back into use in the West in 1890 with vibrators being a little earlier than that. Further throwing in an element of fantasy or steampunk can open up all sorts of possibilities for coming up with toys of your own invention.

Do I need to slow it down? 

Sometimes sex is tearing each others' clothes off and bam. bam. bam. done. In my experience though there is often a lot of starts and stops in sex. Taking clothes off, moving to another room, talking about what is going to happen, getting out any toys that are needed, remembering you left the lube in the bathroom, or office, or kitchen, having to stop and regroup because something doesn't work, getting totally distracted by kissing and you both forget what your hands are doing.

When I write I remind myself that this isn't a bad thing. Often as a writer my inclination is to push through the scene (I'm like that about every scene) as quickly as possible but it's okay to slow the sex scene down, stop the action for a little bit, address something else, have them touch in ways meant to comfort or relax rather than arouse and move on. This is particularly important if the characters don't know each other's bodies well yet, or are in the mood for something slower, or if they are with a partner who has physical or psychological needs they might not be completely sure about how to handle yet.

I remind myself constantly that the sex scenes in a book are not just filler, they are not just an obligation that needs to be fulfilled when one writes romance. They are there to deepen the relationship between the two characters but also for characterization. What comes out in sex can tell us a lot about who this character is and that's important too. So often it's appropriate to slow the action down and take my time.

What about laughter, or crying?

I once read a review of an amazing indie queer porn site where the reviewer talked about her favorite part of the one shoot was that one of the actresses couldn't stop laughing. Going and watching that particular scene I found the reviewer was right, every few minutes the actress would break out into a fit of giggles. At which point her partners would grin, kiss and cuddle her. The scene was nothing unusual, nothing I hadn't seen before but the laughter and the fact that everyone seemed to be having so much funny, really stuck with me.

Sex can be hilarious, when it goes wrong, or when it goes right. Laughter can break up an awkward moment or making room for some affectionate cuddling. Sometimes we laugh when we are happy, when we feel safe, relaxed, when things feel good. I try to keep in mind that serious sex doesn't necessarily equal good sex and breaking out in a fit of the giggles does not mean something has necessarily gone wrong.

Likewise crying doesn't mean the sex was bad, or the person involved is weak or lesser. We have some negative stereotypes of people who cry during or after sex but there can be lots of reasons for doing so. A character can cry if they are happy, if they are overstimulated, if the entire scene brings up a lot of emotions due to passed experiences.

I try not to be afraid to put either laughter or tears into my sex scenes if that is what is needed.

What about dirty talk? 

Dirty talk is one of those things I feel like I'm really bad at but want to get better at writing. I think it can be incredibly hot when done write and a good way for partners to communicate what feels good and what they want during sex.

Mostly I try to keep my characters talking during the scene even if it's just "Oh God, that feels good."  Again I feel like it's the showing not telling thing.

Do the characters need to come for it to be a good sex scene? 

This is in interesting one. I've seen not coming and it still being good sex addressed in lesbian erotica and porn but not so much in gay stuff where most of the emphasis seems to be on the money shot.

Still it is worth noting that depending on your character the sex scene can be hot, good and fulfilling without both or either parties reaching orgasm. People can still feel pleasure and still feel loved without physically reaching orgasm, it depends on the person and situation. Some people might actually prefer not to physically orgasm as part of sex, and there are many perfectly good reasons for this.

There are also several situations within m/m romance where you might want to considered writing a sex scene in which both characters feel fulfilled without technically reaching orgasm or ejaculation. If you are writing about a character with erectile dysfunction, psychological issues or a past sexual trauma, who has already ejaculated recently, or who has been castrated you might want to think a lot about whether orgasm in nessisarily the "end point" or the point at all of the sex scene.

Have I written this sex scene before in this story? 

As far as I am concerned this is vital. I'm not big into saying you should never do something writing wise because there are always lots of great examples of people who have done that thing and been amazing at it. If I am going to say never do something though it would be this: never write the same sex scene twice in a story. Don't do it! Just don't! It kills a romance or erotica story. Kills it dead. You've already written a scene where one character sucked the other character and then there was anal penetration with cuddling afterwards. No other sex scene in the story should have a blow job followed by anal followed by sweaty cuddles. Don't do it! In fact I'd think long and hard before I'd write either blow jobs or anal again in that story at all. Sure people like to repeat what feels sexy for them but these super common sex acts in romance and erotica can get pretty boring to read pretty quick. Go with frottage, or hand jobs, or intercrural sex or have one character masturbate on the kitchen counter while the other one watches.Write pony play, write Japanese rope bondage, or write fingering in a sex swing, write a really intense cuddle/make out session.

If I am stuck and can't think of anything beyond what I've already written I stop writing and go read some erotic, or watch some porn, or look at dirty artwork on Tumblr, until I come up with something.


Most importantly I try to be creative and have fun. There are thousands of sexual acts, kinks, toys, positions, so many ways of having sex.